Saturday, June 4, 2011

The milk-shot

If you have seen any porn ever, you will probably know what a cumshot is. The ejaculation of semen on the female participant. Sometimes if not often, it's in the face of the woman. This is cool, it's the climax of porn.

But what if the roles were reversed? Not many women can ejaculate or squirt, but they can indeed lactate...

 This guy got milked?!

Possible intention
A cumshot to the face is sexy. Some people are turned on by lactaion, so why not combine it?


Why is this wrong?
 As I have stated before, lactaion is a wierd thing to get turned on by. But this, this is... Well what the fuck is it? It's an ugly gut moaning while getting his face covered by the milk of a lactation woman. It's just not sexy. 
 
Breast milk is for babies. Biologically speaking, it has no sexual intention, unlike sperm. And what's up with the lactating titties? They are not that sexy, and they spray like a fucking garden sprinkler!
 
I just got the chills from looking at the picture, it's just disgusting. Eww.

What's going on?

Okay, so NOBODY has contributed with captions or explanations for the picture. And this blog has had almost 6000 views!! Become somewhat active dudes ;-)


Therefore, I try again. Wrinte me an email or post it as a comment right here in this post. Give me your best shot, and you will be adored!

Monday, May 16, 2011

Disappointment

I like hot chicks, and I like hot chicks who are naked in public. Especially when they do naughty stuff!

Therefore it might confuse you, why the following picture ended up in the Porn That's Wrong blog, but let's get to it!


All she needs is chocolate dipped strawberries.

Possible intention
Lets take a rather sexy girl with no panties and make her flash her pussy while doing something very naughty in a public room!



Why is this wrong?
As stated in the introduction, this picture actually contains some of my favorite elements of porn.

BUT.. I also like champagne, and I get champagne much more rarely, then I get laid (when I prioritize, lovemaking beats moneymaking!)
Therefore I get so fucking disappointed  from considering how much money is wasted on that bubbly. And then just to wash her pussy. The disappointment get's me distracted, and then my boner dies.

At least she could have somebody, anybody lick up the fermented grape juice.

All that nice, cold, refreshing nectar of devine nature could be used so much better!

I.... I... I just want that champagne! How could you do that? It's so meaningless!

If you wanted her to be naughty, couldn't you just tell her to do the same, but with mineral water? or a damn popsicle?

By the way, what the fuck is up with that yellow balloon in the top right corner? Once spotted, I can't stop looking at it. It looks like it's been cut in there by a novice photoshopper!

I'll drown away my sorrow and disappointment, have a happy weekend motherfuckers.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Little person fattyback riding

I guess some times, narcotics are used by artists, as a way of exploring the unreal world, the fontiers of the human mind, with the purpose of capturing these impressions in various forms of art.

This is not that case.

This is more like a case of idiotic pornmakers on bad crack.

 "We get 50 bucks for doing WHAT? and looking happy, We'll do it! "
 
Possible intention
Reconstruction of the dialogue leading to this scenario:

"PfftthwaahahahahaHAHAHA.. What if? WhAT iF? WHAT IF... we put a pantless fucking dwarf on a fat fucking ugly girl and let them ride around the living room?"

"*snort* Yeah, that's fucking art man, pornart!"



Why is this wrong?
If you need any explanation to why there's something wrong here, please press this link, for the sake of humanity, please!

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

This may ruin your next family dinner

Group sex, that's good porn !

  
Yes, that IS pubic hair, an artifact from before pornovolution made all pussies hairless.

Possible intention
This is a gangbang, with a majority of chicks. Hell YEAH!



Why is this wrong? 
This could very well be your parents! In fact, according to Murpheys law, it probably is! 

Have fun, trying to forget the above picture at your next family dinner, with your parents and the specially invited  "aunts".

coming home for dinner son?

Prioritizing

Okay, so it's been a while since the last time we presented some wrongful porn to ya'll.  But don't worry, it's not because the internet had a colon cleansing and got rid of the all the bad shit. We just prioritized other stuff like paying the bills and getting drunk.

Speaking of prioritizing, that's something we all do, all the time. It's the reason we behave the way we do, and choose not to do stuff, that we find stupid. What most men prioritize, is having sex with hot chicks!


Or defile their feet..


Possible intention
Hot chick in a hot dress on a hot car, and it's a hot summer day.  It couldn't be any hotter.
And yes.. I get it, it's all about the foot fetish! That's a wierd thing, but come on, this scenario is hot as a pizza oven in hell!



Why is this wrong? 
The guy who might get his dick sunbuned prioritize strangely. Right in front of him is a very hot chick, with very big tits almost falling out of her sexy dress, and he chooses to aim for the damn foot?


That's like the most nonchalante move ever! 
I can imagine the chick say "Uh, I'm hot and horny, I've put on makeup, my dress is short and my tits are falling overboard, wanna do me outside, now?
-and the guy is like " Yeah, let me just get my dick out and I'll wank untill I make a complete mess of your foot!"
If I ever, ever, EVER get in a situation like that and do the same thing, please murder me. 
It's like winning the lottery and returning the money, because you already had your allowance this week!


I get as frustrated watching this, as I get from watching "Who wants to be a millionaire" and knowing all the answers when the contestants doesn't!

I'm not saying, that it's wrong to have a foot fetish (but its not completely right either, is it?). But in any case, choosing a foot over something absurdly sexy is weird.

Prioritize, but do it right!

Saturday, April 9, 2011

Soles and vagina

When a photographer takes a picture, he tries to get all the good stuff inside the frame, and leave the other stuff outside. Depending on how good the photographer is, he's also able to get a nice composition in the shot, but I have this feeling, that porno-photographers may be thinking too much about tits and twats and not enough about the golden ration and lights properties.





Possible intention
It's a pussy close up, what is there to.. HOLY SHIT, what are those two black things, wich are totally in my face?!?! Her goddamn boot soles, dang it. How could the photographer ignore this!?
The intention is to get pussy all over my laptop screen. I want it so big, it's like I'm really there, plus let me have it magnified! I want to see the pussy in all it's glory!


Why is this wrong?
If I choose to watch a close up of the wrinkled meat curtains, then that's all I want! I don't want anything else, because that could easily distract my attention towards non-sexual stuff.


In this exact shot, the photographer not only manages to get the very unsexy soles in the shot, more than one third of the frame is filled with those construction site safety shoe soles!
The worst part must be the fact that the phtographer has taken the picture with such accurate focus on the womans hairy vagina, that it makes the depth of the shot very intense. 
This meaning that the soles seem like the are right in front of my very face! 

Now the true question is; was this photo supposed to be like this, or was it an accident? Only the man behind the camera will know, but if that's you, please tell me!